38.6c New Delhi, India, Sunday, February 22, 2026
Top Stories Supreme Court
Political NEWS Legislative Corner Celebstreet International Videos
Subscribe Contact Us
close
Judiciary

INX Media Case: SC Dismisses Chidambaram's Plea For Anticipatory Bail In CBI Case

By LawStreet News Network      26 August, 2019 02:13 PM      0 Comments
INX Media Case: SC Dismisses Chidambaram's Plea For Anticipatory Bail In CBI Case

The Supreme Court on August 26, 2019, has dismissed former Union Finance Minister P. Chidambaram's appeal against Delhi High court order denying anticipatory bail in the CBI case.

A Bench comprising of Justices Bhanumati and A.S. Bopanna said since Chidambaram has been arrested, it will not hear the petition as it has become 'infructuous'.

The Bench said that he is at liberty to seek regular bail before the trial court, adding that the trial court must consider the application for regular bail without being influenced by the observations made by the Delhi High Court.

Senior Advocates Kapil Sibal and Dr. A.M. Singhvi, appearing for Chidambaram, tried to convince the Bench that the petition had not become infructuous as he was arrested on August 21, 2019, while his petition was pending in the apex court.

They submitted that the investigation agency could not have arrested him when his case was listed for consideration on August 23, 2019. The Court has power to restore the status quo ante with regard to the arrest which was made against the listing of the Court, the advocates argued.

The Bench, however, rejected the submissions and ordered the petition to be dismissed.

Apart from the CBI case for alleged corruption in INX media case, the Enforcement Directorate has filed another case for alleged money laundering in the transaction. The Bench is separately considering the bail plea moved in the ED case.

INX Media Case

 INX Media Case: Timeline

 



Share this article:

User Avatar
About:


Leave a feedback about this
TRENDING NEWS

us-sc-strikes-down-trumps-global-tariffs-rules-ieepa-does-not-authorize-president-to-impose-duties
Trending International
US SC Strikes Down Trump’s Global Tariffs, Rules IEEPA Does Not Authorize President to Impose Duties [Read Order]

US Supreme Court strikes down Trump’s global tariffs, ruling that IEEPA does not authorize the President to impose import duties.

21 February, 2026 02:45 PM
kerala-hc-issues-notice-to-cbfc-over-certification-of-the-kerala-story-2-goes-beyond
Trending Judiciary
Kerala HC Issues Notice to CBFC Over Certification of ‘The Kerala Story 2 – Goes Beyond’

Kerala High Court issues notice to CBFC over certification of The Kerala Story 2, questions safeguards under Cinematograph Act; release not stayed.

21 February, 2026 02:50 PM

TOP STORIES

sc-declines-to-entertain-plea-over-alleged-anti-muslim-remarks-by-assam-cm-says-approach-hc
Trending Judiciary
SC Declines to Entertain Plea Over Alleged Anti-Muslim Remarks by Assam CM, Says Approach HC

Supreme Court asks petitioners to approach Gauhati High Court over alleged hate speech by Assam CM, declines plea for FIRs and SIT probe.

16 February, 2026 02:52 PM
can-live-in-partner-be-prosecuted-under-section-498a-ipc-sc-to-decide-scope-of-husband-in-cruelty-law
Trending Judiciary
Can Live-In Partner Be Prosecuted Under Section 498A IPC? SC To Decide Scope Of ‘Husband’ In Cruelty Law [Read Order]

Supreme Court to decide if a man in a live-in relationship can be prosecuted under Section 498A IPC for cruelty. Case to impact scope of “husband”.

16 February, 2026 03:33 PM
sc-sets-aside-anticipatory-bail-granted-to-absconding-murder-accused-in-madhya-pradesh-political-rivalry-case
Trending Judiciary
SC Sets Aside Anticipatory Bail Granted To Absconding Murder Accused In Madhya Pradesh Political Rivalry Case [Read Judgment]

Supreme Court sets aside anticipatory bail to absconding murder accused in MP political rivalry case, calls HC order perverse and unjustified.

16 February, 2026 03:59 PM
places-of-worship-act-does-not-protect-illegal-encroachments-on-government-land-madras-hc
Trending Judiciary
Places of Worship Act Does Not Protect Illegal Encroachments on Government Land: Madras HC [Read Order]

Madras High Court rules that Places of Worship Act, 1991 does not protect temples built on encroached government land; eviction upheld in Ramanathapuram case.

16 February, 2026 04:18 PM

ADVERTISEMENT


Join Group

Signup for Our Newsletter

Get Exclusive access to members only content by email