38.6c New Delhi, India, Monday, January 12, 2026
Top Stories Supreme Court
Political NEWS Legislative Corner Celebstreet International Videos
Subscribe Contact Us
close
Judiciary

INX Media Case: SC Dismisses Chidambaram's Plea For Anticipatory Bail In CBI Case

By LawStreet News Network      26 August, 2019 02:13 PM      0 Comments
INX Media Case: SC Dismisses Chidambaram's Plea For Anticipatory Bail In CBI Case

The Supreme Court on August 26, 2019, has dismissed former Union Finance Minister P. Chidambaram's appeal against Delhi High court order denying anticipatory bail in the CBI case.

A Bench comprising of Justices Bhanumati and A.S. Bopanna said since Chidambaram has been arrested, it will not hear the petition as it has become 'infructuous'.

The Bench said that he is at liberty to seek regular bail before the trial court, adding that the trial court must consider the application for regular bail without being influenced by the observations made by the Delhi High Court.

Senior Advocates Kapil Sibal and Dr. A.M. Singhvi, appearing for Chidambaram, tried to convince the Bench that the petition had not become infructuous as he was arrested on August 21, 2019, while his petition was pending in the apex court.

They submitted that the investigation agency could not have arrested him when his case was listed for consideration on August 23, 2019. The Court has power to restore the status quo ante with regard to the arrest which was made against the listing of the Court, the advocates argued.

The Bench, however, rejected the submissions and ordered the petition to be dismissed.

Apart from the CBI case for alleged corruption in INX media case, the Enforcement Directorate has filed another case for alleged money laundering in the transaction. The Bench is separately considering the bail plea moved in the ED case.

INX Media Case

 INX Media Case: Timeline

 



Share this article:

User Avatar
About:


Leave a feedback about this
TRENDING NEWS


TOP STORIES

wrong-bail-orders-alone-without-evidence-of-corruption-cannot-justify-removal-of-judicial-officer-sc
Trending Judiciary
Wrong Bail Orders Alone, Without Evidence of Corruption, Cannot Justify Removal of Judicial Officer: SC [Read Judgment]

Supreme Court rules that wrong bail orders alone cannot justify removal of a judicial officer without proof of corruption, misconduct, or extraneous considerations.

06 January, 2026 07:43 PM
divorced-muslim-woman-can-seek-maintenance-under-crpc-even-after-receiving-amount-under-muslim-women-protection-act-kerala-hc
Trending Judiciary
Divorced Muslim Woman Can Seek Maintenance Under CrPC Even After Receiving Amount Under Muslim Women Protection Act: Kerala HC [Read Order]

Kerala High Court holds that a divorced Muslim woman can claim maintenance under Section 125 CrPC even after receiving amounts under the 1986 Act.

06 January, 2026 08:19 PM
delhi-hc-full-bench-settles-bsf-seniority-dispute-rule-of-continuous-regular-appointment-prevails
Trending Judiciary
Delhi HC Full Bench Settles BSF Seniority Dispute; Rule of ‘Continuous Regular Appointment’ Prevails [Read Judgment]

Delhi High Court Full Bench rules BSF seniority is based on date of continuous regular appointment, rejecting claims for antedated seniority due to delayed joining.

06 January, 2026 08:45 PM
borrowers-cannot-invoke-writ-jurisdiction-to-compel-banks-to-extend-one-time-settlement-benefits-kerala-hc
Trending Judiciary
Borrowers Cannot Invoke Writ Jurisdiction to Compel Banks to Extend One-Time Settlement Benefits: Kerala HC [Read Judgment]

Kerala High Court holds borrowers cannot invoke writ jurisdiction to compel banks to grant One-Time Settlement benefits, as OTS is not a legal right.

07 January, 2026 09:22 PM

ADVERTISEMENT


Join Group

Signup for Our Newsletter

Get Exclusive access to members only content by email