38.6c New Delhi, India, Wednesday, March 11, 2026
Top Stories Supreme Court
Political NEWS Legislative Corner Celebstreet International Videos
Subscribe Contact Us
close
Judiciary

SC Dismisses Petition Seeking Determination Of Minority Status Of Religion, Based On Population Of Concerned State

By LawStreet News Network      21 February, 2020 10:02 PM      0 Comments
SC Dismisses Petition Seeking Determination Of Minority

A Public Interest Litigation (PIL) filed before the Supreme Court of India was dismissed on Thursday (February 20, 2020) which prayed that the minority status of religion be ascertained based on their population in the concerned State. Petitioner pointed out that Hindus are not considered minorities even in the states where they are not in majority. The bench consisted of Justices RF Nariman and S Ravindra Bhat, who asked the petitioner, Senior Advocate and BJP Spokesperson Ashwini Upadhayay to approach each High Court of the respective States to redefine the Status of the minorities of the State. The petition was filed under Article 32 of the Constitution of India, 1949which deals with Remedies for enforcement of rights conferred in this Part of III;

(1) The right to move the Supreme Court by appropriate proceedings for the enforcement of the rights conferred by this Part is guaranteed

(2) The Supreme Court shall have the power to issue directions or orders or writs, including writs like habeas corpus, mandamus, prohibition, quo warranto and certiorari, whichever may be appropriate, for the enforcement of any of the rights conferred by this Part

(3) Without prejudice to the powers conferred on the Supreme Court by clauses (1) and (2), Parliament may by law empower any other court to exercise within the local limits of its jurisdiction all or any of the powers exercisable by the Supreme Court under clause (2)

(4) The right guaranteed by this article shall not be suspended except as otherwise provided for by this Constitution.

The PIL sought direction or guidelines from the Bench of the Apex Court to identify the minorities in the spirit mentioned in the Article 29-30. The argument which was made by the petitioner was following the judgment made by the eleven judge bench in TMA Pai v. Union of India (2002) wanted to ensure that only those religious and linguistic groups which are economically, socially and politically non-dominant and inferior in number, enjoy the rights and get the protection under the Article 29-30. The status of Hindus in the areas like Lakshadweep, Mizoram, Nagaland, Meghalaya, Jammu and Kashmir, Arunachal Pradesh, Punjab, and Manipur is 2.5 per cent, 2.75 per cent, 8.75 per cent, 11.53 per cent, 28.44 per cent, 29 per cent, 31.39 per cent and 38.40, respectively. 

Senior Advocate Vikas Singh gave an argument in the Supreme Court that the Centre should be allowed to redefine the term minorities in a state-wise manner. The Petitioner while addressing the media said that he will soon be submitting a petition in the Delhi High Court. 

 

Author: Asif Iqbal



Share this article:

User Avatar
About:


Leave a feedback about this
TRENDING NEWS

tarun-holi-murder-case-delhi-police-पर-क्यों-नाराज़-हैं-पड़ोसी-law-street-journal
Trending Videos
Tarun Holi Murder Case: Delhi Police पर क्यों नाराज़ हैं पड़ोसी? || Law Street Journal

In this ground report on the Tarun Holi Murder Case, the team of Law Street Journal reaches Uttam Nagar, Delhi, where a shocking incident during Holi celebrations allegedly led to the death of a young man, Tarun. The dispute reportedly began after a Holi balloon thrown by a child accidentally hit a woman, which later escalated into a violent confrontation.

10 March, 2026 07:33 PM

TOP STORIES

sc-invokes-article-139a-withdraws-three-decade-old-criminal-revision-petitions-from-allahabad-hc-to-itself
Trending Judiciary
SC Invokes Article 139A, Withdraws Three Decade-Old Criminal Revision Petitions From Allahabad HC To Itself [Read Order]

Supreme Court invokes Article 139A to transfer three decade-old criminal revision petitions from Allahabad High Court to itself, citing exceptional delay and public importance.

06 March, 2026 04:18 PM
deity-may-not-vote-but-constitution-speaks-madras-hc-finds-wilful-contempt-over-delay-in-recovering-507-acres-of-temple-land
Trending Judiciary
“Deity May Not Vote, But Constitution Speaks”: Madras HC Finds Wilful Contempt Over Delay in Recovering 507 Acres of Temple Land [Read Order]

Madras High Court finds wilful contempt by officials for failing to recover 507 acres of temple land, remarking that a deity may not vote but the Constitution must protect its rights.

06 March, 2026 04:38 PM
intra-court-appeal-maintainable-against-ex-parte-ad-interim-orders-affecting-statutory-remedy-rights-kerala-hc
Trending Judiciary
Intra-Court Appeal Maintainable Against Ex Parte Ad Interim Orders Affecting Statutory Remedy Rights: Kerala HC [Read Judgment]

Kerala High Court rules intra-court appeals are maintainable against ex parte ad interim orders that affect a party’s right to pursue statutory remedies.

06 March, 2026 04:59 PM
i-was-stalked-in-the-early-days-of-my-practice-justice-savitri-ratho-recalls-experience-at-iwil-national-conference
Trending Legal Insiders
“I Was Stalked in the Early Days of My Practice”: Justice Savitri Ratho Recalls Experience at IWIL National Conference

Justice Savitri Ratho recalls being stalked during her early legal career at the IWIL National Conference, highlighting challenges faced by women in the profession.

09 March, 2026 06:21 PM

ADVERTISEMENT


Join Group

Signup for Our Newsletter

Get Exclusive access to members only content by email