38.6c New Delhi, India, Saturday, June 22, 2024

SC Issues Notice To UP Government On Plea Challenging The Renaming Of Allahabad As Prayagraj

By LawStreet News Network      20 January, 2020 11:01 PM      0 Comments
SC Issues Notice To UP Government On Plea Challenging The Renaming Of Allahabad As Prayagraj

The Apex Court today (20 January, 2020) issued a notice on a plea challenging Uttar Pradesh State Government's decision renaming the city of Allahabad as Prayagraj in 2018.

The Allahabad Heritage Society filed a petition challenging the decision on 26 February, 2019. 

This petition was dismissed by the High Court stating that renaming the city does not affect the public life of people neither does the Court interfere in policy matters of a State.

However the plea filed by Advocate Shadan Farasat stated that the name is associated with the city for over 400 years and it has great sentiments attached with the people irrespective of their religion. 

Moreover the petitioner contended that High Court can intervene in the matters if it is associated with fundamental rights of the people mentioned in Part III of the Constitution of India, 1949.

Further the petitioner argued that the decision was a product of whims of the State Government and was not in accordance with public support.

The 1954 and 1981 notifications together make clear that names of historical places should not be changed except in the following conditions -

  1. State reasons in detail for providing a new name
  2. Specific reason should also be provided
  3. No such change should take place for the sake of local patriotism
  4. Precautions should be taken that there is no village or town etc. of the same name which might lead to confusion.

The State Governments before announcing such change should have a prior approval of the Union Government but with respect to Allahabad district no such approval took place.

Hence the 2018 decision of renaming Allahabad to Prayagraj was a violation of Article 14 and 27 (Right against arbitrary action), Right to identity Article 21, and the mandate to protect India's composite culture under Article 29 of the Constitution.

Author: Aarya Mishra

Share this article:

User Avatar

Leave a feedback about this

Trending Judiciary
Gravity of offence not relevant when considering bail for juvenile [Read Order]

Allahabad High Court grants bail to a juvenile in a serious criminal case, ruling that the gravity of the offence is not a relevant factor in bail decisions.

22 June, 2024 11:18 AM
Trending Executive
New Anti-Cheating Law enacted: Analysis

In-depth analysis of India’s new Anti-Cheating Law, the Public Examinations (Prevention of Unfair Means) Act, 2024, aimed at curbing exam malpractices.

22 June, 2024 11:38 AM


Trending Crime, Police And Law
Women, including housewife, approach NCW against controversial IPS officer Gyaneshwar Singh

Two women approach NCW against controversial IPS officer Gyaneshwar Singh, citing harassment for tweets based on news reports about his involvement in high-profile cases.

17 June, 2024 03:10 PM
Trending Judiciary
Courts this Week: Law Street Journal's Weekly Round-Up of SC & HCs [June 10 - June 15]

Get the latest updates from the Supreme Court of India and the High Courts ! Here’s a round up of the week's top legal stories in a quick, easy-to-read summary.

17 June, 2024 03:29 PM
Trending Business
Man sues Apple for £5 million, blaming company for divorce after wife discovers ‘deleted messages’ with sex workers

A UK man sues Apple for £5M, claiming their unclear policy on deleted messages led to his divorce after his wife found texts to sex workers on another device.

17 June, 2024 04:26 PM
Trending Crime, Police And Law
Ex-Karnataka CM Yediyurappa appears before CID for POCSO case probe, with protection of 'no arrest'

Ex-Karnataka CM Yediyurappa appears before CID for POCSO case probe, denies allegations, granted ‘no arrest’ protection. Next hearing: June 28.

17 June, 2024 04:46 PM


Join Group

Signup for Our Newsletter

Get Exclusive access to members only content by email