38.6c New Delhi, India, Wednesday, December 17, 2025
Top Stories Supreme Court
Political NEWS Legislative Corner Celebstreet International Videos
Subscribe Contact Us
close
Judiciary

Plea in SUPREME COURT against Delhi High Court Interviewing Public Prosecutor Nominee

By LawStreet News Network      12 May, 2022 12:20 PM      0 Comments
SUPREME COURT against Delhi High Court Public Prosecutor Nominee

Plea in SUPREME COURT AGAINST DELHI HIGH COURT INTERVIEWING PUBLIC PROSECUTOR NOMINEE; DEMANDS FOR NOTIFYING CANDIDATES SELECTED BY DELHI GOVTS PANEL AND APPROVED BY LG.

Practicing Lawyer Amit Sahni has approached Supreme Court against Delhi High Courts call to interview/interact with the candidates selected by the Delhi Govts committee and approved by the Honble LG of Delhi on 04-03-2020, for representing Criminal Matters before the Honble High Court of Delhi as Standing Counsel, Additional Standing Counsel, Additional Public Prosecutors.

The petitions submit that the interviews for purpose of selection of Advocates for the aforesaid Civil and Criminal Panel were conducted by a selection committee headed by the Honble Law Minister, Law Secretary and the Secretary (Home), Govt. of NCT of Delhi in last year December and Committee forwarded names of selected Advocates to the Honble LG, which approved the appointments of both Civil Panel and Criminal Panel Lawyers to represent cases before the High Court of Delhi on 04-03-2022.

Later notification was issued on 04-03-2022 in exercise of powers conferred under sub section (7) of section 2 of the code of civil procedure (5 of 1908) and all other powers enabling him in this behalf, the Lt. Governor of NCT of Delhi regarding Civil Panel Counsels before Delhi High Court.  

But the list, in respect of the Standing Counsel, Additional Standing Counsel, Additional Public Prosecutor and Penal Counsel (to represent criminal matters), the names of candidates were also finally selected by the Govt. of NCT of Delhi and approved by the Honble LG of Delhi on 04-03-2022 and the same were forwarded to the Honble High Court of Delhi as required under section 24 (1) of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 and such names have been put on hold since march this year as the same are not cleared as yet.

Amit Sahni had made a representation dated 19-04-2022 to CJI and Acting CJI, requesting that the recommendations of the Selection Committee of GNCTD and approved by LG of Delhi (on 04-03-2022) be given effect to in terms of section 24(1) of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (as amended upto date) and the process of de-novo interview of candidates be recalled in order to avoid the conflict of powers between the Judiciary and the Executive and also in the interest of justice.

Mentioning no action has been taken upon the same to the knowledge of the Petitioner till date, Mr. Sahni moved SC for seeking its interreference.



Share this article:

User Avatar
About:


Leave a feedback about this
TRENDING NEWS

working-wife-with-sufficient-income-not-entitled-to-interim-maintenance-but-childs-maintenance-must-be-paid-from-date-of-application-bombay-hc
Trending Judiciary
Working Wife with Sufficient Income Not Entitled to Interim Maintenance, but Child’s Maintenance Must Be Paid from Date of Application: Bombay HC [Read Judgment]

Bombay High Court rules that a working wife with sufficient income is not entitled to interim maintenance; child’s maintenance must be paid from the date of application.

16 December, 2025 09:01 PM

TOP STORIES

kangana-ranaut-slams-rahul-gandhis-vote-chori-claim-in-lok-sabha-questions-evidence-on-voter-fraud
Trending Executive
Kangana Ranaut Slams Rahul Gandhi’s ‘Vote Chori’ Claim in Lok Sabha, Questions Evidence on Voter Fraud

Kangana Ranaut challenges Rahul Gandhi’s voter fraud allegations in Parliament, reigniting debate on electoral integrity and institutional trust.

11 December, 2025 06:47 PM
sc-arbitrators-mandate-ends-after-statutory-deadline-substitution-mandatory-under-section-29a
Trending Judiciary
SC: Arbitrator’s Mandate Ends After Statutory Deadline; Substitution Mandatory Under Section 29A [Read Judgment]

Supreme Court holds that an arbitrator’s mandate ends after the statutory period expires and mandates substitution under Section 29A for continued proceedings.

11 December, 2025 06:52 PM
sc-orders-aiims-to-form-secondary-medical-board-to-evaluate-passive-euthanasia-for-man-in-vegetative-state-for-13-years
Trending Judiciary
SC Orders AIIMS to Form Secondary Medical Board to Evaluate Passive Euthanasia for Man in Vegetative State for 13 Years [Read Order]

Supreme Court directs AIIMS to form a Secondary Medical Board to assess passive euthanasia for a man in a vegetative state for 13 years.

13 December, 2025 06:00 PM
endless-compassion-not-permissible-sc-bars-claims-for-higher-post-after-compassionate-appointment
Trending Judiciary
‘Endless Compassion Not Permissible’: SC Bars Claims for Higher Post After Compassionate Appointment [Read Judgment]

Supreme Court rules that employees cannot seek higher posts after accepting compassionate appointment, calling such claims “endless compassion.”

13 December, 2025 06:54 PM

ADVERTISEMENT


Join Group

Signup for Our Newsletter

Get Exclusive access to members only content by email