38.6c New Delhi, India, Sunday, August 17, 2025
Top Stories Supreme Court
Political NEWS Legislative Corner Celebstreet International Videos
Subscribe Contact Us
close
Judiciary

Supreme Court expresses strong disapproval over Faizabad Bar Association’s strikes [Read Order]

By Saket Sourav      04 September, 2024 03:53 PM      0 Comments
Supreme Court expresses strong disapproval over Faizabad Bar Associations strikes

New Delhi: The Supreme Court of India has delivered a significant order expressing strong disapproval of the Faizabad Bar Association’s conduct, particularly regarding their practice of calling strikes and abstaining from judicial work.

A bench comprising Justices Surya Kant and Ujjal Bhuyan heard a petition filed by the Faizabad Bar Association challenging a judgment of the Allahabad High Court. The High Court had previously ordered the constitution of an Elders Committee to oversee the Association’s affairs and ensure elections to its Governing Council were held by December 2024.

During the proceedings on September 2, 2024, the Court took note of the Association’s conduct, as highlighted in the impugned High Court judgment. In response, learned senior counsel for the petitioner Bar Association fairly stated that every office bearer would file an undertaking by way of an affidavit.

Expressing its view on the matter, the court stated: “Having been apprised of the conduct of the members of the Faizabad Bar Association as highlighted by the High Court in paragraph 14 of the impugned judgment, as well as in its post-decisional script, learned senior counsel for the petitioner – Bar Association fairly states that every office bearer of the petitioner – Bar Association will file an undertaking by way of an affidavit before the District Judge, High Court, and this Court that they shall never pass any resolution for abstaining from work. If there is any grievance of the members of the Bar Association, they shall approach the District Judge or, if need be, the Administrative Judge/portfolio Judge of the High Court for redressal of their grievances.”

Additionally, the court noted that if members of the Bar Association have any grievances, they should approach the proper authorities within the judicial hierarchy for redressal, rather than resorting to work stoppages.

In conclusion, the court posted the matter for further hearing on September 13, 2024, directing that the requisite affidavits be filed by that date.

 [Read Order]



Share this article:

About:

Saket is a final-year law student at The National Law University and Judicial Academy, Assam. He has...Read more

Follow:
Linkedin


Leave a feedback about this
Related Posts
View All

Another CBI Officer Investigating Rakesh Asthana Moves SC Against Transfer, Makes Startling Revelations Another CBI Officer Investigating Rakesh Asthana Moves SC Against Transfer, Makes Startling Revelations

After A.K. Bassi, another CBI officer who was investigating corruption allegations against Special Director Rakesh Asthana moved the Supreme Court.

Ayodhya verdict: SC rules in favour of Ram Lalla, Sunni Waqf Board gets alternate land Ayodhya verdict: SC rules in favour of Ram Lalla, Sunni Waqf Board gets alternate land

SC bench led by CJI Ranjan Gogoi has allotted the dispute site to Ram Janmabhoomi Nyas, while directing the government to allot an alternate 5 acre land within Ayodhya to Sunni Waqf Board to build a mosque.

Supreme Court: Money Spent On Judiciary Less Than 1% In All States Except Delhi Supreme Court: Money Spent On Judiciary Less Than 1% In All States Except Delhi

The court guided all states to document their response to the commission's report within four weeks. If any of the states fail to file a response, it will be presumed that they have no objections to the recommendations made by the commission, the court said.

Supreme Court Top Panel Names Chief Justices for Bombay, Orissa and Meghalaya High Courts Supreme Court Top Panel Names Chief Justices for Bombay, Orissa and Meghalaya High Courts

On April 18, 2020, the Supreme Court Collegium recommended new Chief Justices for three High Courts. Justice Dipankar Datta was proposed as Chief Justice of the Bombay High Court, succeeding Justice B.P. Dharmadhikari. Justice Biswanath Somadder was nominated as Chief Justice of Meghalaya High Court, while Justice Mohammad Rafiq was recommended for transfer as Chief Justice of Orissa High Court.

TRENDING NEWS


TOP STORIES

sc-declines-to-interfere-with-patkars-conviction-in-defamation-case
Trending Judiciary
SC declines to interfere with Patkar's conviction in defamation case

SC refuses to interfere with Medha Patkar’s conviction in 2001 defamation case filed by Delhi L-G V K Saxena, but sets aside ₹1 lakh penalty imposed on her.

11 August, 2025 02:29 PM
sc-directs-for-removing-stray-dogs-in-delhi-ncr
Trending Judiciary
SC directs for removing stray dogs in Delhi NCR

SC orders removal of all stray dogs in Delhi-NCR within 8 weeks, to be housed in shelters; warns against obstruction amid rising rabies, dog-bite cases.

11 August, 2025 06:42 PM
hc-judges-in-no-way-inferior-to-sc-judges-sc
Trending Judiciary
HC judges in no way inferior to SC judges: SC

SC affirms HC judges are equal in stature to SC judges; directs apology for unfounded allegations against Telangana HC judge.

12 August, 2025 12:14 PM
law-does-not-require-to-provide-separate-list-of-electors-not-included-in-draft-rolls
Trending Judiciary
Law does not require to provide separate list of electors not included in draft rolls, EC tells SC

EC tells SC no legal mandate to publish separate list or reasons for voters excluded from draft rolls; affected persons can file claims under Form 6.

12 August, 2025 12:33 PM

ADVERTISEMENT


Join Group

Signup for Our Newsletter

Get Exclusive access to members only content by email