38.6c New Delhi, India, Sunday, November 09, 2025
Top Stories Supreme Court
Political NEWS Legislative Corner Celebstreet International Videos
Subscribe Contact Us
close
Judiciary

Supreme Court expresses strong disapproval over Faizabad Bar Association’s strikes [Read Order]

By Saket Sourav      04 September, 2024 03:53 PM      0 Comments
Supreme Court expresses strong disapproval over Faizabad Bar Associations strikes

New Delhi: The Supreme Court of India has delivered a significant order expressing strong disapproval of the Faizabad Bar Association’s conduct, particularly regarding their practice of calling strikes and abstaining from judicial work.

A bench comprising Justices Surya Kant and Ujjal Bhuyan heard a petition filed by the Faizabad Bar Association challenging a judgment of the Allahabad High Court. The High Court had previously ordered the constitution of an Elders Committee to oversee the Association’s affairs and ensure elections to its Governing Council were held by December 2024.

During the proceedings on September 2, 2024, the Court took note of the Association’s conduct, as highlighted in the impugned High Court judgment. In response, learned senior counsel for the petitioner Bar Association fairly stated that every office bearer would file an undertaking by way of an affidavit.

Expressing its view on the matter, the court stated: “Having been apprised of the conduct of the members of the Faizabad Bar Association as highlighted by the High Court in paragraph 14 of the impugned judgment, as well as in its post-decisional script, learned senior counsel for the petitioner – Bar Association fairly states that every office bearer of the petitioner – Bar Association will file an undertaking by way of an affidavit before the District Judge, High Court, and this Court that they shall never pass any resolution for abstaining from work. If there is any grievance of the members of the Bar Association, they shall approach the District Judge or, if need be, the Administrative Judge/portfolio Judge of the High Court for redressal of their grievances.”

Additionally, the court noted that if members of the Bar Association have any grievances, they should approach the proper authorities within the judicial hierarchy for redressal, rather than resorting to work stoppages.

In conclusion, the court posted the matter for further hearing on September 13, 2024, directing that the requisite affidavits be filed by that date.

 [Read Order]



Share this article:

About:

Saket is a final-year law student at The National Law University and Judicial Academy, Assam. He has...Read more

Follow:
Linkedin


Leave a feedback about this
Related Posts
View All

Another CBI Officer Investigating Rakesh Asthana Moves SC Against Transfer, Makes Startling Revelations Another CBI Officer Investigating Rakesh Asthana Moves SC Against Transfer, Makes Startling Revelations

After A.K. Bassi, another CBI officer who was investigating corruption allegations against Special Director Rakesh Asthana moved the Supreme Court.

Ayodhya verdict: SC rules in favour of Ram Lalla, Sunni Waqf Board gets alternate land Ayodhya verdict: SC rules in favour of Ram Lalla, Sunni Waqf Board gets alternate land

SC bench led by CJI Ranjan Gogoi has allotted the dispute site to Ram Janmabhoomi Nyas, while directing the government to allot an alternate 5 acre land within Ayodhya to Sunni Waqf Board to build a mosque.

Supreme Court: Money Spent On Judiciary Less Than 1% In All States Except Delhi Supreme Court: Money Spent On Judiciary Less Than 1% In All States Except Delhi

The court guided all states to document their response to the commission's report within four weeks. If any of the states fail to file a response, it will be presumed that they have no objections to the recommendations made by the commission, the court said.

Supreme Court Top Panel Names Chief Justices for Bombay, Orissa and Meghalaya High Courts Supreme Court Top Panel Names Chief Justices for Bombay, Orissa and Meghalaya High Courts

On April 18, 2020, the Supreme Court Collegium recommended new Chief Justices for three High Courts. Justice Dipankar Datta was proposed as Chief Justice of the Bombay High Court, succeeding Justice B.P. Dharmadhikari. Justice Biswanath Somadder was nominated as Chief Justice of Meghalaya High Court, while Justice Mohammad Rafiq was recommended for transfer as Chief Justice of Orissa High Court.

TRENDING NEWS

mere-use-of-word-arbitration-does-not-create-valid-arbitration-agreement-sc
Trending Judiciary
Mere Use of Word “Arbitration” Does Not Create Valid Arbitration Agreement: SC [Read Judgment]

Supreme Court rules that mere use of the word “arbitration” in a contract clause doesn’t constitute a valid arbitration agreement without clear intent.

08 November, 2025 01:14 PM
sc-issues-notice-on-plea-seeking-one-third-reservation-for-women-in-state-bar-councils
Trending Judiciary
SC Issues Notice on Plea Seeking One-Third Reservation for Women in State Bar Councils [Read Order]

Supreme Court issues notice on plea seeking one-third reservation for women in all State Bar Councils to ensure gender equality in legal governance.

08 November, 2025 01:39 PM

TOP STORIES

no-law-student-shall-be-barred-from-exams-or-academic-progression-due-to-attendane-shortage-delhi-hc
Trending Judiciary
No Law Student Shall Be Barred From Exams Or Academic Progression Due To Attendane Shortage: Delhi HC [Read Judgment]

Delhi HC rules no law student can be barred from exams or academic progress for low attendance; directs BCI to rethink attendance norms and strengthen grievance systems.

03 November, 2025 04:03 PM
mere-refusal-to-marry-does-not-constitute-instigation-under-section-306-ipc-supreme-court
Trending Judiciary
Mere Refusal To Marry Does Not Constitute Instigation Under Section 306 IPC: Supreme Court [Read Order]

Mere refusal to marry does not amount to instigation under Section 306 IPC, rules Supreme Court, quashing FIR and holding no abetment in emotional distress cases.

03 November, 2025 04:15 PM
government-cannot-unilaterally-expand-labour-dispute-scope-without-workers-demand-himachal-pradesh-hc
Trending Judiciary
Government cannot unilaterally expand labour dispute scope without workers’ demand: Himachal Pradesh HC [Read Order]

Government cannot suo motu expand labour dispute scope without workers’ demand, rules Himachal Pradesh High Court, holding termination issues need separate notice.

03 November, 2025 04:21 PM
child-welfare-committee-cannot-direct-police-to-register-fir-allahabad-hc
Trending Judiciary
Child Welfare Committee Cannot Direct Police to Register FIR: Allahabad HC [Read Order]

Child Welfare Committees cannot direct police to register FIRs, rules Allahabad High Court, holding their powers are limited to children needing care and protection.

03 November, 2025 04:29 PM

ADVERTISEMENT


Join Group

Signup for Our Newsletter

Get Exclusive access to members only content by email