38.6c New Delhi, India, Thursday, October 23, 2025
Top Stories Supreme Court
Political NEWS Legislative Corner Celebstreet International Videos
Subscribe Contact Us
close
Judiciary

Supreme Court to Hear Presidential Reference on Bill Clearance Timelines from August 19

By Jhanak Sharma      29 July, 2025 04:43 PM      0 Comments
Supreme Court to Hear Presidential Reference on Bill Clearance Timelines from August 19

NEW DELHI: The Supreme Court on Tuesday fixed the dates of hearing from August 19 to September 10 on Presidential Reference if the court can lay down timelines and procedures for the President and Governors on Bills passed by State legislature.

A five-judge bench led by Chief Justice of India B R Gavai said the hearing schedule would not be altered under any circumstance.

The court appointed advocates Aman Mehta and Nisha Rohatgi as the nodal counsel on the sides of the Union government and the parties opposing reference, respectively, to prepare their compilations on the issue.

The bench, also comprising Justices Surya Kant, Vikram Nath, P S Narasimha and AS Chandurkar asked the parties to file their respective written submissions by August 12.

The court also granted one hour first to the States of Kerala and Tamil Nadu to raise their point to the maintainability of the Reference.

Thereafter, the court will start hearing Attorney General and Union supporting the reference on August 19, 20, 21 and 26.

The parties opposing the Presidential reference would be heard on August 28, and September 2, 3 and 9.

The court said, the rejoinder, arguments would be heard on September 10.

Also Read: SC notice to Centre, States on presidential reference on timelines to clear Bills

Senior Advocate K K Venugopal, appearing for the State of Kerala, the court had already answered 11 questions out of 14 the Presidential reference has sent in the State of Tamil Nadu Vs the Governor of Tamil Nadu (2025) case.

Senior advocates Abhishek Manu Singhvi and P Wilson, also submitted that the Tamil Nadu Government has also filed a plea opposing the validity of the Reference.

On July 22, the Supreme Court had issued notice to the Centre and all state governments on the presidential reference related to prescribing timelines for Governors and the President to act on Bills passed by the legislative assembly of a state.

Kerala and Tamil Nadu opposed the reference, contending it sought to overrule the April 8, 2025 judgment which was impermissible.

The reference was made on May 13, 2025 after the April 8, 2025 judgment in the case of Tamil Nadu.

The reference was made by the President in exercise of power under Article 143(1) of the Constitution which allows the top constitutional head to seek the opinion of the Supreme Court on any question of law or fact of public importance.



Share this article:

About:

Jhanak is a lawyer by profession and legal journalist by passion. She graduated at the top of her cl...Read more

Follow:
FacebookTwitterLinkedinInstagram


Leave a feedback about this
Related Posts
View All

Another CBI Officer Investigating Rakesh Asthana Moves SC Against Transfer, Makes Startling Revelations Another CBI Officer Investigating Rakesh Asthana Moves SC Against Transfer, Makes Startling Revelations

After A.K. Bassi, another CBI officer who was investigating corruption allegations against Special Director Rakesh Asthana moved the Supreme Court.

Ayodhya verdict: SC rules in favour of Ram Lalla, Sunni Waqf Board gets alternate land Ayodhya verdict: SC rules in favour of Ram Lalla, Sunni Waqf Board gets alternate land

SC bench led by CJI Ranjan Gogoi has allotted the dispute site to Ram Janmabhoomi Nyas, while directing the government to allot an alternate 5 acre land within Ayodhya to Sunni Waqf Board to build a mosque.

Supreme Court: Money Spent On Judiciary Less Than 1% In All States Except Delhi Supreme Court: Money Spent On Judiciary Less Than 1% In All States Except Delhi

The court guided all states to document their response to the commission's report within four weeks. If any of the states fail to file a response, it will be presumed that they have no objections to the recommendations made by the commission, the court said.

Supreme Court Top Panel Names Chief Justices for Bombay, Orissa and Meghalaya High Courts Supreme Court Top Panel Names Chief Justices for Bombay, Orissa and Meghalaya High Courts

On April 18, 2020, the Supreme Court Collegium recommended new Chief Justices for three High Courts. Justice Dipankar Datta was proposed as Chief Justice of the Bombay High Court, succeeding Justice B.P. Dharmadhikari. Justice Biswanath Somadder was nominated as Chief Justice of Meghalaya High Court, while Justice Mohammad Rafiq was recommended for transfer as Chief Justice of Orissa High Court.

TRENDING NEWS


TOP STORIES

father-of-deceased-pilot-in-ahmedabad-crash-moves-sc-for-court-monitored-probe
Trending Judiciary
Father of deceased pilot in Ahmedabad crash moves SC for court monitored probe

91-year-old father of pilot killed in Ahmedabad Air India crash moves SC seeking court-monitored probe into alleged biased and flawed investigation.

17 October, 2025 10:54 AM
child-cant-consent-to-sex-life-imprisonment-upheld-for-sexual-assault-on-minor-girl-madras-hc
Trending Judiciary
Child Can’t Consent to Sex — Life Imprisonment Upheld for Sexual Assault on Minor Girl: Madras HC [Read Judgment]

Madras HC upholds life imprisonment for assault on minor SC girl, reiterating that a child cannot consent to sex; school records key for age proof.

17 October, 2025 11:45 AM
sc-criticizes-casual-declaration-of-witnesses-as-hostile-upholds-conviction-under-sc-st-act
Trending Judiciary
SC Criticizes Casual Declaration of Witnesses as Hostile, Upholds Conviction under SC/ST Act [Read Judgment]

Supreme Court slams casual practice of declaring witnesses hostile; upholds life imprisonment in SC/ST Act case involving rape of minor girl.

17 October, 2025 11:55 AM
delhi-hc-quashes-22-year-old-complaint-against-advocate-reiterates-that-a-lawyers-office-is-not-a-commercial-activity
Trending Judiciary
Delhi HC Quashes 22-Year Old Complaint Against Advocate, Reiterates That A Lawyer’s Office Is Not A Commercial Activity [Read Judgment]

Delhi HC quashes 22-year-old complaint against advocate, rules that a lawyer’s office is not a commercial activity under MDP 2001 and Building Bye-Laws.

17 October, 2025 01:42 PM

ADVERTISEMENT


Join Group

Signup for Our Newsletter

Get Exclusive access to members only content by email