38.6c New Delhi, India, Friday, August 29, 2025
Top Stories Supreme Court
Political NEWS Legislative Corner Celebstreet International Videos
Subscribe Contact Us
close
Judiciary

Supreme Court Upholds Wife’s Right to Pre-Divorce Living Standards, restores Rs. 1.75 lakh monthly maintenance [Read Judgment]

By Saket Sourav      20 November, 2024 04:35 PM      0 Comments
Supreme Court Upholds Wifes Right to Pre Divorce Living Standards restores Rs 1 75 lakh monthly maintenance

New Delhi: The Supreme Court has delivered a significant judgment restoring monthly interim maintenance of Rs 1.75 lakh to a wife during divorce proceedings, setting aside the Madras High Court’s reduction to Rs 80,000 and emphasizing the importance of maintaining pre-divorce living standards.

Justices Vikram Nath and Prasanna B. Varale made important observations on maintenance quantum and living standards in matrimonial disputes.

The court addressed the case between Dr. Rajiv Verghese and Rose Chakkrammankkil Francis, where their marriage was solemnized on September 15, 2008, according to Christian customs.

The court noted, “The Family Court found that the respondent specifically stated that when the parties were residing together, he engaged two maids on 24x7 basis to aid them in their domestic work and maintenance and the appellant is accustomed to these comforts.”

Addressing the husband’s financial status, the court observed, “The respondent is a renowned expert in cardiology and has a number of worthful properties and is the only legal heir to his father who has passed away. He is accruing all the incomes from the properties owned by his mother and himself and is also found to have been in possession of a school.”

Wife’s Right to Interim Maintenance in India

The court highlighted the High Court’s limitations in assessment, stating, “The High Court has not dealt with the findings of the Family Court wherein the respondent is said to own a number of worthful properties and the fact that he is the only legal heir of his father. The High Court has not dealt with the aspect of the number of properties owned by the respondent and looked at the rental income from one property.”

In response to the appeals, the court concluded, “The appellant was accustomed to a certain standard of living in her matrimonial home and therefore, during the pendency of the divorce petition, is also entitled to enjoy the same amenities of life as she would have been entitled to in her matrimonial home.”

High Court’s Oversight on Husband’s Financial Status Addressed

The court emphasized that during divorce proceedings, a wife’s right to maintain her accustomed standard of living must be protected, effectively setting a precedent for similar cases in the future. The judgment restored the Family Court’s order of Rs 1.75 lakh monthly maintenance, dismissing the husband’s appeal for reduction.

Case title: Dr. Rajiv Verghese vs Rose Chakkrammankkil Francis

[Read Judgment]



Share this article:

About:

Saket is a final-year law student at The National Law University and Judicial Academy, Assam. He has...Read more

Follow:
Linkedin


Leave a feedback about this
Related Posts
View All

Another CBI Officer Investigating Rakesh Asthana Moves SC Against Transfer, Makes Startling Revelations Another CBI Officer Investigating Rakesh Asthana Moves SC Against Transfer, Makes Startling Revelations

After A.K. Bassi, another CBI officer who was investigating corruption allegations against Special Director Rakesh Asthana moved the Supreme Court.

Ayodhya verdict: SC rules in favour of Ram Lalla, Sunni Waqf Board gets alternate land Ayodhya verdict: SC rules in favour of Ram Lalla, Sunni Waqf Board gets alternate land

SC bench led by CJI Ranjan Gogoi has allotted the dispute site to Ram Janmabhoomi Nyas, while directing the government to allot an alternate 5 acre land within Ayodhya to Sunni Waqf Board to build a mosque.

Supreme Court: Money Spent On Judiciary Less Than 1% In All States Except Delhi Supreme Court: Money Spent On Judiciary Less Than 1% In All States Except Delhi

The court guided all states to document their response to the commission's report within four weeks. If any of the states fail to file a response, it will be presumed that they have no objections to the recommendations made by the commission, the court said.

Supreme Court Top Panel Names Chief Justices for Bombay, Orissa and Meghalaya High Courts Supreme Court Top Panel Names Chief Justices for Bombay, Orissa and Meghalaya High Courts

On April 18, 2020, the Supreme Court Collegium recommended new Chief Justices for three High Courts. Justice Dipankar Datta was proposed as Chief Justice of the Bombay High Court, succeeding Justice B.P. Dharmadhikari. Justice Biswanath Somadder was nominated as Chief Justice of Meghalaya High Court, while Justice Mohammad Rafiq was recommended for transfer as Chief Justice of Orissa High Court.

TRENDING NEWS


TOP STORIES

adult-woman-free-to-live-with-married-man-personal-autonomy-prevails-over-morality
Trending Judiciary
Adult Woman Free To Live With Married Man, Personal Autonomy Prevails Over Morality: Madhya Pradesh HC [Read Order]

Adult woman has right to live with married man, rules MP High Court; says personal autonomy outweighs moral concerns.

23 August, 2025 04:00 PM
sc-issues-notice-to-bci-on-plea-against-3-yr-moratorium-on-new-centre-for-legal-education
Trending Judiciary
SC issues notice to BCI on plea against 3-yr moratorium on new centre for legal education

SC issues notice to BCI on plea challenging 3-year moratorium on new legal education centres, calling it arbitrary and violative of fundamental rights.

23 August, 2025 05:13 PM
punjab-and-haryana-hc-upholds-denial-of-furlough-to-life-convict-rules-temporary-release-is-a-concession-not-a-right
Trending Judiciary
Punjab and Haryana HC Upholds Denial of Furlough to Life Convict, Rules Temporary Release Is A Concession, Not A Right [Read Order]

Punjab & Haryana HC upholds denial of furlough to life convict, rules temporary release is a concession, not a right, under 2022 law.

23 August, 2025 05:16 PM
sc-restores-mandatory-20-percent-deposit-for-suspension-of-sentence-in-cheque-bounce-case
Trending Judiciary
SC Restores Mandatory 20% Deposit for Suspension of Sentence in Cheque Bounce Case [Read Order]

SC sets aside P&H HC order; rules 20% deposit mandatory for suspension of sentence in ₹8.65 crore cheque bounce case under NI Act.

25 August, 2025 12:35 PM

ADVERTISEMENT


Join Group

Signup for Our Newsletter

Get Exclusive access to members only content by email