38.6c New Delhi, India, Friday, October 25, 2024
Breaking News
Top Stories Supreme Court
Political NEWS Legislative Corner Celebstreet International Videos
Subscribe Contact Us
close
Judiciary

WB files plea in SC against HC order for CBI probe into Sandeshkhali incidents of sexual exploitation, land grab

By Jhanak Singh      29 April, 2024 12:21 PM      0 Comments
WB files plea in SC against HC order for CBI probe into Sandeshkhali incidents of sexual exploitation land grab

NEW DELHI: The West Bengal government has filed a plea in the Supreme Court against the Calcutta High Court's April 10 order for the CBI probe into charges of sexual exploitation of women and land grab made against TMC leader Sheikh Shahjahan and others in Sandeshkhali in North 24 Parganas district.

A bench led by Justice B R Gavai is likely to take up the matter on April 29.

The Mamata Banerjee government claimed said the HC went by the fact the CBI was already probing attack on ED officials in Sandeshkhali and completely overlooked, the fact that while giving supremacy to the political voices in a court proceeding, not only vitiated the matter at hand, but further would lead to biased investigation.

Also Read -  Sandeshkhali: PIL asks SC for court monitored CBI probe; transfer outside WB

It also pointed out the High Court heavily relied on the report of National Commission for Scheduled Tribes, which was inconclusive.

It said the mode and manner in which the sensitive issue has been politicised and exploited for political gains, and attributed criminality on the state government. The order cast an aspersion on the conduct of the state government, overlooking all the efforts taken by it till date, it said.

It claimed the High Court's order demoralised the entire state machinery, including the police force which has tirelessly and endlessly carried out their duties to ensure that the perpetrators are apprehended and prosecuted, but also the officials from the land records department, who have been termed guilty for mutating the land, and held to be co-conspirators in a callous manner.

"Therefore not only the transfer of investigation but also the allegations and observations against the state government are required to be interfered with," the plea said.

The plea also stated the HC order, which has called for a report from the CBI on the investigation, has further painted the entire state machinery at fault attributing culpability of the state officials in the land grabbing allegations, which prima facie are unwarranted and would lead to the CBI embroiling the state officials in their investigation.

"The High Court in a very generic order directed the State to provide the required support to the CBI without any guidelines, which amounts to usurping the powers of the state police to investigate any cognisable offence in the Sandeshkhali area, even if the same is not related to the allegations levelled by the PIL petitioners," the plea said.

The purported affidavits of alleged victims enclosed along PIL is not kosher and subject to further verification as the petitioner in person i.e., Priyanka Tibrewal is the spokesperson of a political party in opposition who is steering political protest in Sandeshkhali. Therefore, the said directions are unwarranted and not sustainable in the eyes of law, the state government said.

"The High Court has failed to appreciate that the PIL petitioners, intervenors and other related parties are interested parties with oblique political motives and any liberty granted to them to file complaints before the CBI would overburden the agency with frivolous complaints and further denude the actual victims of a reasonable opportunity to file a complaint," it said.

The state government also claimed no actionable material was placed before the High Court to suggest police inaction in relations to the alleged incidents, as nearly 43 FIRs have been registered and the earliest of which was registered four years ago and.the last FIR was lodged on February 10, 2024.

Also Read - Sandeshkhali sexual assault: SC stays proceedings before Lok Sabha Privileges Committee against WB officers [Read SC Order]

Further out of the 43 FIRs, in 42 cases, chargesheets have been filed under various penal sections including Section 376 IPC. The High Court also noted that in seven cases of land grabbing, charge sheets have been filed on February 08, 2024, apart from 24 cases of land grabbing having been registered by the state police.

"In its haste in painting the entire state machinery as biased and in cohoots with the ruling dispensation, the High Court's division bench completely ignored the material placed before it indicating the measures taken by the state government and police in the investigation," it alleged.

Widespread protests were witnessed in Sandeshkhali since February 7, 2024, alleging molestation, rape and land grabbing against TMC leader Sheikh Sahajahan and his associates, Shibu Hazra and Sushanta Sardar alias Uttam Sardar.  



Share this article:

About:

Jhanak is a lawyer by profession and legal journalist by passion. She graduated at the top of her cl...Read more

Follow:
FacebookTwitterLinkedinInstagram


Leave a feedback about this
Related Posts
View All

AIBA cautions West Bengal about President's Rule over Sandeshkhali [Press Release] AIBA cautions West Bengal about President's Rule over Sandeshkhali [Press Release]

All India Bar Association writes to West Bengal CM cautioning about demands for President's Rule over Sandeshkhali violence.

Sandeshkhali sexual assault: SC stays proceedings before Lok Sabha Privileges Committee against WB officers [Read SC Order] Sandeshkhali sexual assault: SC stays proceedings before Lok Sabha Privileges Committee against WB officers [Read SC Order]

SC stays Lok Sabha Committee proceedings on Sandeshkhali case, questioning claims against WB officers and citing police injuries in the incident.

[Attack on ED officers] West Bengal moves Supreme Court against CBI probe; seeks urgent listing [Attack on ED officers] West Bengal moves Supreme Court against CBI probe; seeks urgent listing

West Bengal was moved the Supreme Court challenging High Courts order directing CBI probe in Sandeshkhali incident.

Shouldnt Sheikh Shahjahan be removed from office? Calcutta HC asks Shouldnt Sheikh Shahjahan be removed from office? Calcutta HC asks

Calcutta High Court asks if Sheikh Shahjahan can continue in his post of Pradhan of Zilla Parishad, while in CBI custody for the Sandeshkhali sexual assault and land grabbing cases.

TRENDING NEWS

cheque-issued-for-bribe-payment-not-enforceable-under-ni-act-punjab-and-haryana-hc
Trending Judiciary
Cheque issued for bribe payment not enforceable under NI Act: Punjab and Haryana HC [Read Order]

The Punjab and Haryana High Court ruled that bribe payments do not constitute legally enforceable liabilities under the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881.

24 October, 2024 10:56 AM
pune-porsche-accident-bombay-hc-rejects-anticipatory-bail-over-alleged-evidence-tampering-involving-3-lakh-bribe
Trending Judiciary
Pune Porsche Accident: Bombay HC rejects anticipatory bail over alleged evidence tampering involving ₹3 lakh bribe [Read Order]

Bombay High Court rejects anticipatory bail in Pune Porsche accident case, citing serious evidence tampering and bribery allegations against the accused’s father.

24 October, 2024 11:07 AM

TOP STORIES

sc-dismisses-plea-for-direction-to-set-up-regulatory-board-to-monitor-and-manage-ott-platforms
Trending Judiciary
SC dismisses plea for direction to set up regulatory board to monitor & manage OTT platforms

SC dismisses plea to set up a regulatory board for OTT platforms, stating the issue falls under policy matters, not for the court to intervene.

19 October, 2024 06:22 PM
a-judges-praise-of-politician-may-affect-publics-trust-in-judiciary-sc-judge-b-r-gavai
Trending Judiciary
A judge's praise of politician may affect public's trust in judiciary: SC judge B R Gavai

SC Judge B R Gavai cautions that judges praising politicians and resigning to contest elections may erode public trust and compromise judicial impartiality.

21 October, 2024 01:34 PM
complainant-cant-insist-on-deciding-plea-to-summon-other-accused-before-cross-examination-sc
Trending Judiciary
Complainant can't insist on deciding plea to summon other accused before cross examination: SC [Read Judgment]

SC rules complainant can’t delay cross-examination to summon others as accused; trial court has discretion on timing under Section 319 CrPC.

21 October, 2024 01:36 PM
sc-dismisses-kejriwals-plea-against-summons-in-defamation-case-on-remarks-on-pms-academic-degree
Trending Judiciary
SC dismisses Kejriwal's plea against summons in defamation case on remarks on PM's academic degree

SC dismisses Kejriwal’s plea challenging summons in defamation case over remarks on PM Modi’s degree, upholding Gujarat University’s complaint.

21 October, 2024 05:10 PM

ADVERTISEMENT


Join Group

Signup for Our Newsletter

Get Exclusive access to members only content by email