38.6c New Delhi, India, Saturday, January 10, 2026
Top Stories Supreme Court
Political NEWS Legislative Corner Celebstreet International Videos
Subscribe Contact Us
close
Legal Insiders

SC Asks Utsav Bains To File Additional Affidavit On Allegation That three Disgruntled Employees Tried To Frame CJI

By LawStreet News Network      24 April, 2019 12:00 AM      0 Comments
SC Asks Utsav Bains To File Additional Affidavit On Allegation That three Disgruntled Employees Tried To Frame CJI

The Supreme Court today (April 24, 2019) asked advocate Utsav Bains to file an additional affidavit to substantiate his allegation that three disgruntled employees of the apex court came together to frame sexual harassment allegations against the Chief Justice of India Ranjan Gogoi.

The Bench comprising of Justices Arun Mishra, R.F. Nariman and Deepak Gupta giving time to Bains, has listed the matter for further hearing on April 25, 2019, at 10:30 am.

In an earlier hearing held today, the Bench summoned CBI Director, Delhi Police Commissioner and the Chief of Intelligence Bureau at 12.30 PM for an in-chamber meeting to decide on the investigation into the alleged conspiracy against CJI.

The meeting was called after the Bench took very serious note of the contents of the affidavit filed by Bains, who was present at the hearing. Bains handed over materials to the court in a sealed cover. He said that the materials contained a CCTV footage which will reveal "many things".

After that, the Bench reassembled at 3 pm to have further interactions with Bains.

In the session, Attorney General K.K. Venugopal said that, "We are only concerned about how a person can file an affidavit of this nature but doesn't produce evidence. I really cannot understand how a person can make certain allegations and claim rest is privileged.

The statement made Bains furious, who complained that the AG is making personal allegations.

This was not appreciated well by Justice Nariman, who said, "You have no right to doubt him. He's the most respectable member of the bar. We all look up to him. If you say doubt, we will throw you out.

At this, Bains said that he was "walking out of the court on his own".

This led, Justice Mishra to intervene, who said to Bains that "You are a young man. Don't take things to your heart. He (J Nariman) didn't mean he'll throw you out. He was communicating his anger.

Continuing the session, Justice Mishra said that We want to know veracity of the affidavit. If he is saying that there are fixers, we want to go to the root of the matter. That is a serious issue before us. We are going to inquire and inquire into it. The Supreme Court will not survive otherwise. Not just us.

Further, Justice Mishra also said that, It is not just about CJI; Trying to fix Benches. Disgruntled employees coming together, three employees were dismissed; such an action has never been taken before by any CJI.

After the hearing, Justice Mishra dictated the order, asking Bains to file another affidavit regarding his allegations against sacked employees. The court also said that it will decide the issue if privilege can be claimed over the communications between Bains and the alleged conspirators.

Senior Advocate Indira Jaising, who was present at the hearing pointed out concerns over possible conflicts between parallel proceedings - the present one and also the in-house inquiry by the panel headed by Justice Bobde.

Answering this, the Bench clarified that the exercise of judicial powers by this Bench will not affect the pending inquiry by the in-house panel.



Share this article:

User Avatar
About:


Leave a feedback about this
TRENDING NEWS

indias-business-families-seek-regulatory-recognition-of-daughters-in-law-as-relatives-under-sebi-takeover-norms
Trending Business
India’s Business Families Seek Regulatory Recognition of Daughters-in-Law as ‘Relatives’ Under SEBI Takeover Norms

Indian business families urge SEBI to recognise daughters-in-law as relatives under takeover norms, citing succession planning, trusts, gender equality and compliance risks.

09 January, 2026 05:58 PM
sc-bail-for-accused-added-under-section-319-crpc-requires-strong-and-cogent-evidence-not-mere-probability-of-complicity
Trending Judiciary
SC: Bail for Accused Added Under Section 319 CrPC Requires Strong and Cogent Evidence, Not Mere Probability of Complicity [Read Order]

Supreme Court rules that bail for accused added under Section 319 CrPC requires strong and cogent evidence, not mere probability of complicity.

09 January, 2026 06:04 PM

TOP STORIES

regulating-hate-restricting-speech-an-analysis-of-the-karnataka-hate-speech-and-hate-crimes-bill-2025
Trending Executive
Regulating Hate, Restricting Speech ? An Analysis Of The Karnataka Hate Speech And Hate Crimes Bill, 2025

Analysis of Karnataka’s Hate Speech Bill, 2025, examining vague definitions, harsh penalties, executive powers, and its impact on free speech.

04 January, 2026 12:48 AM
if-memorial-for-stan-swamy-permitted-on-private-land-no-bar-for-stupa-commemorating-victory-over-colonial-forces-madras-hc
Trending Judiciary
If Memorial for Stan Swamy Permitted on Private Land, No Bar for Stupa Commemorating Victory Over Colonial Forces: Madras HC [Read Order]

Madras High Court held that no government permission is needed to erect a memorial stupa on private patta land, citing the Stan Swamy memorial precedent.

05 January, 2026 05:35 PM
sc-denies-bail-to-umar-khalid-sharjeel-imam-in-2020-delhi-riots-conspiracy-case-grants-bail-to-five-others
Trending Judiciary
SC Denies Bail to Umar Khalid, Sharjeel Imam in 2020 Delhi Riots Conspiracy Case; Grants Bail to Five Others

Supreme Court denies bail to Umar Khalid and Sharjeel Imam in the 2020 Delhi riots conspiracy case, while granting bail to five co-accused.

05 January, 2026 05:55 PM
allahabad-hc-holds-commercial-division-of-high-court-as-proper-forum-for-enforcement-of-domestic-awards-in-international-commercial-arbitration
Trending Judiciary
Allahabad HC holds Commercial Division of High Court as proper forum for enforcement of domestic awards in international commercial arbitration [Read Order]

Allahabad High Court rules that domestic arbitral awards in international commercial arbitration seated in India must be enforced before the High Court’s Commercial Division.

05 January, 2026 06:11 PM

ADVERTISEMENT


Join Group

Signup for Our Newsletter

Get Exclusive access to members only content by email