38.6c New Delhi, India, Thursday, October 09, 2025
Top Stories Supreme Court
Political NEWS Legislative Corner Celebstreet International Videos
Subscribe Contact Us
close
Judiciary

Delhi HC Grants Interim Injunction to Gameskraft Against Trademark and Copyright Infringement by Rogue Websites [Read Order]

By Saket Sourav      30 June, 2025 04:33 PM      0 Comments
Delhi HC Grants Interim Injunction to Gameskraft Against Trademark and Copyright Infringement by Rogue Websites

New Delhi: The Delhi High Court has issued a comprehensive interim injunction order protecting Gameskraft Technologies Private Limited and its affiliate from trademark infringement and copyright violations by multiple rogue websites and unauthorized mobile applications.

Justice Amit Bansal delivered the order, addressing the widespread misuse of Gameskraft’s popular gaming platform trademarks, including “Rummyculture,” “Playship Rummy,” “Pocket52,” “RummyPrime,” “Ludo Culture,” and “RummyTime.”

The court addressed a commercial suit filed by Gameskraft Technologies Private Limited and its affiliate against 36 defendants, including unknown website operators, domain registrars, hosting providers, and government agencies.

Gameskraft, described as one of India’s first gaming companies to build an ISO 9001:2015 certified platform, has been operating since 2017 and reported an annual turnover of approximately ₹3,466 crores in FY 2023–24. The court noted, “Plaintiff No. 1 and its affiliates have catered to a growing group of skill-based players within the online gaming community, and, resultantly, the companies within the group are now among the country’s most recognised online skill-based gaming companies.”

Addressing the defendants’ fraudulent activities, the court observed, “Defendants No. 1 to 16 are misleading unsuspecting users on a daily basis into downloading various unknown apps through suspicious links on their websites, and are entrapping users wanting to use the plaintiffs’ products into downloading dubious apps which have no connection whatsoever with the plaintiffs.”

The court highlighted the scope of trademark infringement, stating, “The usage of the aforementioned websites and infringing apps is not reflected on the plaintiffs’ systems, and any money used in these apps is not deposited with the plaintiffs. Thus, the said apps pose a major financial risk to the public at large.”

In its comprehensive interim order, the court directed, “Defendants No. 1 to 16 are restrained from using the plaintiffs’ marks ‘PLAYSHIP,’ ‘PLEGO,’ ‘LUDO SELECT,’ ‘POCKET52,’ ‘RUMMY,’ ‘RUMMY CULTURE,’ ‘GAMESKRAFT,’ ‘CULTURE OF CHAMPIONS,’ and marks that incorporate one or more of the plaintiffs’ marks.”

The court emphasized the protection of copyrighted content, instructing that the defendants are “restrained from infringing on copyright vested with the plaintiffs in the unique content (textual, visual, pictorial, and video) of their websites located at www.rummyculture.com, www.gamezy.com, www.playship.com, www.rummyprime.com, and www.pocket52.com.”

The court further directed domain registrars and hosting providers to “lock and suspend access to the domain names ‘playshiprummy.net,’ ‘playshiprummy.icu,’ ‘gamezy82.com,’ ‘gamezy.space,’ ‘happymod.com,’ ‘mi9.com,’ ‘gamespot.com,’ ‘sbjhub.com,’ ‘playgoogle.ludoculturepro.com,’ ‘apkpure.net,’ ‘playmods.net,’ and any other domain names discovered during the proceedings to have been engaging in or carrying out fraudulent activities.”

The court also ordered the Department of Telecommunications and the Ministry of Electronics and Information Technology to issue appropriate notifications to Internet Service Providers and Mobile Network Operators to block the infringing websites.

In a significant provision for future protection, the court granted liberty to the plaintiffs to implead additional rogue websites discovered later, allowing the Joint Registrar to extend the injunction order to such newly discovered infringing websites.

The matter is scheduled for further hearing on September 26, 2025, with completion of pleadings listed before the Joint Registrar on July 31, 2025.

Mr. Sandeep Sethi, Senior Advocate, along with Mr. Arun Srikumar, Mr. Abhyudaya Shishodia, and Mr. Ritwik Gupta, Advocates, appeared for the plaintiffs, while Mr. Gaurav Barathi, Advocate, represented the government defendants.

Case Title: Gameskraft Technologies Private Limited & Anr. vs. John Doe & Ors.

[Read Order]



Share this article:

About:

Saket is a final-year law student at The National Law University and Judicial Academy, Assam. He has...Read more

Follow:
Linkedin


Leave a feedback about this
Related Posts
View All

'Without documentary proof, Waqf Board can't lay claim over any property' 'Without documentary proof, Waqf Board can't lay claim over any property'

In 2012, the Anjuman Committee addressed a letter to the Chairman of the Waqf Board stating there is a wall and Chabutrah (platform) on a 'Tiranga Ki Qalandari Masjid where in olden times laborers used to offer prayers.

Delhi High Court Sets Aside Arbitral Tribunal's Award Against NHAI in Highway Project Delay Case [Read Judgment] Delhi High Court Sets Aside Arbitral Tribunal's Award Against NHAI in Highway Project Delay Case [Read Judgment]

The Delhi High Court sets aside an Arbitral Tribunal's award favoring IRB Pathankot Amritsar Toll Road Ltd over a delay in a highway project. The court finds that the tribunal did not address the essential dispute of whether the National Highways Authority of India (NHAI) was in material default, rendering the award invalid.

Delhi Court Rejects Stay Request in Defamation Case Against Rajasthan CM Ashok Gehlot [Read Order] Delhi Court Rejects Stay Request in Defamation Case Against Rajasthan CM Ashok Gehlot [Read Order]

A Delhi court refuses to stay the defamation case filed by Union Cabinet minister Gajendra Singh Shekhawat against Rajasthan Chief Minister Ashok Gehlot. The court declined to stay the summons and sets a hearing date for August 19.

Delhi High Court to Commence Daily Hearings on August 28 for Appeals Against Acquittals in 2G Case Delhi High Court to Commence Daily Hearings on August 28 for Appeals Against Acquittals in 2G Case

Delhi High Court is set to begin day-to-day hearings from August 28 for appeals by CBI and ED against acquittals in the 2G spectrum allocation case, expressing displeasure over adjournment requests. The case involves former telecom minister A Raja and business entities. Learn about the proceedings and details of the case.

TRENDING NEWS

pmla-appellate-tribunal-orders-immediate-release-of-seized-bmw-x7-in-hemant-soren-land-scam-case
Trending Crime, Police And Law
PMLA appellate tribunal orders immediate release of seized BMW X7 in Hemant Soren land scam case [Read Order]

PMLA tribunal orders ED to release seized BMW X7 in Hemant Soren land scam case, citing lack of proof linking the luxury car to money laundering.

08 October, 2025 08:06 PM
offence-under-category-of-upholding-family-prestige-sc-orders-release-of-man-on-remission
Trending Judiciary
'Offence under category of upholding family prestige,' SC orders release of man on remission [Read Judgment]

SC orders immediate release of life convict who served 22 years for a murder committed to uphold family honour, citing Maharashtra remission guidelines.

08 October, 2025 08:19 PM

TOP STORIES

allahabad-hc-refuses-interim-protection-to-sambhal-mosque-asks-petitioners-to-approach-appellate-court
Trending Judiciary
Allahabad HC Refuses Interim Protection to Sambhal Mosque, Asks Petitioners to Approach Appellate Court [Read Order]

Allahabad High Court refused interim protection to Sambhal mosque, directing petitioners to seek remedy before the appellate court under UP Revenue Code.

06 October, 2025 04:48 PM
calling-off-marriage-after-courtship-not-a-crime-or-breach-of-promise-delhi-hc
Trending Judiciary
Calling Off Marriage After Courtship Not A Crime Or Breach Of Promise: Delhi HC [Read Order]

Delhi High Court grants bail, ruling that ending marriage plans after courtship is not a breach of promise or offence under false promise to marry.

06 October, 2025 05:03 PM
celebrating-bail-on-social-media-not-ground-for-cancellation-without-specific-threat-to-complainant-delhi-hc
Trending Judiciary
Celebrating Bail On Social Media Not Ground For Cancellation Without Specific Threat To Complainant: Delhi HC [Read Order]

Delhi HC rules that celebrating bail on social media isn’t grounds for cancellation unless a specific threat or intimidation is proven.

06 October, 2025 05:25 PM
woman-cannot-claim-maintenance-after-securing-rape-conviction-against-live-in-partner-jammu-and-kashmir-hc
Trending Judiciary
Woman Cannot Claim Maintenance After Securing Rape Conviction Against Live-In Partner: Jammu & Kashmir HC [Read Order]

J&K High Court held that a woman who secured a rape conviction against her live-in partner cannot claim maintenance under Section 125 CrPC.

06 October, 2025 06:08 PM

ADVERTISEMENT


Join Group

Signup for Our Newsletter

Get Exclusive access to members only content by email