38.6c New Delhi, India, Monday, November 03, 2025
Top Stories Supreme Court
Political NEWS Legislative Corner Celebstreet International Videos
Subscribe Contact Us
close
Judiciary

Supreme Court Refuses To Intervene In Appointment Of Nageshwar Rao As CBI Interim Director

By LawStreet News Network      19 February, 2019 12:00 AM      0 Comments
Supreme Court Refuses To Intervene In Appointment Of Nageshwar Rao As CBI Interim Director

The Supreme Court today (February 19, 2019) refused to interfere with the appointment of M. Nageswara Rao as Interim Director of the Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI).

A Bench comprising of JusticesArun Mishra and Navin Sinha said that a regular Director of the CBI has now been appointed and therefore no interference is called for.

A joint petition was filed by NGO, Common Cause, and activist Anjali Bhardwaj contending that the appointment of Nageshwar Rao is illegal, arbitrary, mala fide as the government has completely bypassed the statutory requirement to consult the high-powered selection committee of the Prime Minister, Opposition Leader and the Chief Justice of India before appointing the CBI Director.

Further, the petition also contended that Mr. Raos earlier appointment as interim CBI Director following the ouster of Alok Verma on October 23, 2018, was quashed by the Supreme Court in a judgment on January 8, 2019. Yet on January 10, 2019, the Appointment Committee of the Cabinet approved the appointment of Mr. Rao as per the earlier arrangement.

The petitioners had prayed for quashing the appointment of Nageshwar Rao as Interim Director and to make the process of appointment to this post more transparent.

Earlier on January 21, 2019, Chief Justice of IndiaRanjan Gogoi recused himself from hearing the case pointing out that he will be participating in the meeting of the Selection Committee set up to appoint the Director of CBI.

Thereafter, JusticeA.K. Sikri and JusticeN.V. Ramana also recused themselves from hearing the case on account of different reasons. Hence, the case was eventually listed before the Bench presided by Justice Mishra.



Share this article:

User Avatar
About:


Leave a feedback about this
TRENDING NEWS


TOP STORIES

special-courts-can-order-release-of-seized-vehicles-under-ndps-act-sc
Trending Judiciary
Special Courts Can Order Release of Seized Vehicles Under NDPS Act: SC [Read Judgment]

SC: Special Courts under NDPS Act retain power to release seized vehicles; 2022 Rules can’t override statutory jurisdiction of Special Courts.

28 October, 2025 01:35 PM
sc-holds-mere-delay-in-suit-cant-legalise-infringement-in-ipr-disputes
Trending Judiciary
SC holds mere delay in suit can't legalise infringement in IPR disputes [Read Judgment]

SC: Delay in filing suit doesn’t legalise patent infringement; urgency must be judged by ongoing injury, not delay, to protect IPR and public interest.

28 October, 2025 02:08 PM
madhya-pradesh-hc-dissolves-marriage-terms-false-alcoholism-allegations-as-mental-cruelty
Trending Judiciary
Madhya Pradesh HC Dissolves Marriage, Terms False Alcoholism Allegations As Mental Cruelty [Read Judgment]

MP High Court dissolves marriage, holding wife’s false alcoholism allegations against husband amounted to mental cruelty and justified divorce.

28 October, 2025 02:29 PM
delhi-hc-suspends-life-sentence-of-woman-convicted-in-murder-case-cites-11-years-incarceration-and-plight-of-minor-children
Trending Judiciary
Delhi HC Suspends Life Sentence Of Woman Convicted In Murder Case, Cites 11 Years Incarceration And Plight Of Minor Children [Read Judgment]

Delhi HC suspends woman’s life term in murder case, citing 11 years in jail, good conduct, and welfare of her three minor children.

28 October, 2025 03:00 PM

ADVERTISEMENT


Join Group

Signup for Our Newsletter

Get Exclusive access to members only content by email