New Delhi, India  
Breaking News
Judiciary

Supreme Court This Week: Key Rulings You Should Know

By Saket Sourav      17 hours ago      0 Comments
Supreme Court This Week Key Rulings You Should Know

Uncrystallized Damages From Breach of Contract Not Operational Debt Under IBC: Supreme Court 

The Supreme Court set aside admission of an insolvency case against a power-project owner, ruling that while milestone payments due under an EPC contract count as operational debt, claims for suspension, idling and demobilization charges are damages that only become operational debt once crystallized by a court or arbitral tribunal. It also found the claim time-barred, having crystallized back in 2012, and left the contractor to pursue arbitration instead. Read more

Bribe Demand Must Be Proved Before Section 20 Presumption Can Apply: Supreme Court 

The Supreme Court acquitted a Talati-cum-Mantri and a Peon convicted for allegedly demanding a ₹120 bribe, holding the prosecution failed to prove the demand beyond reasonable doubt so the statutory presumption under Section 20 of the Prevention of Corruption Act never arose. It also found the prosecution sanction invalid, having been granted by an officer without the competence to do so. Read more

FIR Can Be Registered Even After Magistrate Rejects Section 156(3) CrPC Application: Supreme Court 

The Supreme Court held that a Magistrate's rejection of a Section 156(3) application doesn't bar police from later registering an FIR on the same allegations, since such rejection isn't a merits adjudication and doesn't attract res judicata. It relied on its recent ruling in S.C. Garg to draw the line between orders that decide merits and those that merely regulate the start of investigation. Read more

Caste Abuse Inside Closed Room Not "Public View" Under SC/ST Act: Supreme Court 

The Supreme Court quashed SC/ST Act charges against a school manager, holding that alleged caste-based abuse occurring inside an enclosed room with no members of the public present or able to witness it doesn't meet the statutory "public view" threshold. It also noted neither the FIR nor the complainant's statement specified any actual caste-based words used. Read more

Tribunals Under Senior Citizens Act Can Order Eviction To Protect Elderly Parents: Supreme Court 

The Supreme Court restored an eviction order against a son who had allegedly forced his elderly mother out of her own home, holding that tribunals under the Maintenance and Welfare of Parents and Senior Citizens Act, 2007 do have implied power to order eviction where necessary to protect a senior citizen even though the Act doesn't say so expressly. Read more

Exemption From Attachment of Judgment-Debtor's House Does Not Extend to Legal Heirs: Supreme Court 

The Supreme Court held that the CPC exemption protecting a judgment-debtor's residential house from attachment (Section 60(1)(ccc)) is personal to the debtor and cannot be claimed by legal heirs after his death. It set aside a High Court order that had remitted a decades-old bank recovery execution for fresh inquiry, allowing the auction-purchaser's and bank's appeals. Read more

Black Money In Elections Compromises Democracy's Core : Supreme Court  

Hearing an appeal over a quashed IR involving cash allegedly meant for bribing voters, the Supreme Court held that unaccounted cash used to influence elections corrodes the democratic process itself, and issued a detailed set of directions on 24-hour reporting of cash seizures, one-year investigation timelines, and High Court approval before withdrawing election-related prosecutions. Read more

Children Entitled to Parental Consortium Along With Spousal Consortium in Motor Accident Claims : Supreme Court  

The Supreme Court enhanced compensation for a pedestrian's widow and three children, holding the children had been wrongly denied parental consortium by both the Tribunal and High Court. It awarded each of the four dependents wife and children alike ₹48,400 under consortium, raising the total award from ₹11 lakh to about ₹12.47 lakh. Read more

Electricity Boards Face Strict, Not Absolute Liability For Electrocution Deaths : Supreme Court  

The Supreme Court set aside two writ-based compensation awards against a state power utility, holding that electricity boards are liable under strict liability which allows recognised defences like contributory negligence rather than the exception-free absolute liability standard. Since both cases involved disputed facts, the claimants were left to pursue the civil courts instead. Read more

llegal Absorption Cannot Be Validated By Long Service : Supreme Court 

The Supreme Court set aside the deputation and absorption of four Haryana Development and Panchayat Department officers into the PW(B&R) Department as Assistant Engineers, holding that an illegal appointment is void from inception and cannot be cured merely by long years of service. It rejected the High Court's "sympathetic" approach of letting the officers stay on while denying them seniority, and directed their outright repatriation to their parent department. Read more



Share this article:

About:

Saket is a law graduate from The National Law University and Judicial Academy, Assam. He has a keen ...Read more

Follow:
Linkedin


Leave a feedback about this
Related Posts
View All

Another CBI Officer Investigating Rakesh Asthana Moves SC Against Transfer, Makes Startling Revelations Another CBI Officer Investigating Rakesh Asthana Moves SC Against Transfer, Makes Startling Revelations

After A.K. Bassi, another CBI officer who was investigating corruption allegations against Special Director Rakesh Asthana moved the Supreme Court.

Ayodhya verdict: SC rules in favour of Ram Lalla, Sunni Waqf Board gets alternate land Ayodhya verdict: SC rules in favour of Ram Lalla, Sunni Waqf Board gets alternate land

SC bench led by CJI Ranjan Gogoi has allotted the dispute site to Ram Janmabhoomi Nyas, while directing the government to allot an alternate 5 acre land within Ayodhya to Sunni Waqf Board to build a mosque.

Supreme Court: Money Spent On Judiciary Less Than 1% In All States Except Delhi Supreme Court: Money Spent On Judiciary Less Than 1% In All States Except Delhi

The court guided all states to document their response to the commission's report within four weeks. If any of the states fail to file a response, it will be presumed that they have no objections to the recommendations made by the commission, the court said.

Supreme Court Top Panel Names Chief Justices for Bombay, Orissa and Meghalaya High Courts Supreme Court Top Panel Names Chief Justices for Bombay, Orissa and Meghalaya High Courts

On April 18, 2020, the Supreme Court Collegium recommended new Chief Justices for three High Courts. Justice Dipankar Datta was proposed as Chief Justice of the Bombay High Court, succeeding Justice B.P. Dharmadhikari. Justice Biswanath Somadder was nominated as Chief Justice of Meghalaya High Court, while Justice Mohammad Rafiq was recommended for transfer as Chief Justice of Orissa High Court.

New Release

Senior Citizens Rights Handbook

The Senior Citizen Rights Handbook is a comprehensive guide designed to empower elderly citizens with clear and accessible knowledge of their legal and social rights in India.

Join Group

Signup for Our Newsletter

Get Exclusive access to members only content by email